Recently a bogus letter was written to the head of the DSM V Committee, David Kupfer MD, by several psychiatrists, arguing that Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) should be removed from the DSM. Here is the letter:

Letter asking for removal of DID from DSM

Letter asking for removal of DID from DSM

They didn’t have any solid reason to ask for this, other than the fact that they thought it was an “embarassment to psychiatry.” Here is their argument:

Due to the assumption that trauma is a primary etiological factor, the DID diagnosis has resulted in wrongful accusations of sexual abuse on the basis of recovered memories, not only in North America but throughout the developed world (references). DID has caused mockery of psychiatry, and, for patients, has led to misdiagnosis (13) and inadequate treatment of depression (14) [not only depression, but other disorders that it’s distracted attention away from; also, this reference seems rather thin to make a strong statement on. Perhaps it would be better not to reference this, but simply assert that treatable causes of problems are missed when the DID diagnosis is applied].

They conclude

There are overwhelming reasons to question the validity of Dissociative Identity Disorder. We respectfully urge you as members of the Work Group and the Task Force to drop the category of dissociative disorders from the upcoming DSM-V because it is scientifically unjustified, clinically harmful to patients and their families, and it undermines the credibility of psychiatry.

 

Signed:

1.     Paul R. McHugh, M.D. Distinguished Service Professor of Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins University.

2.     Harrison Pope, Jr., MD, MPH, Professor of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Director, Biological Psychiatry Laboratory, McLean Hospital, Belmont Massachusetts 

3.     James Hudson, MD, ScD, Professor of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Director, Biological Psychiatry Laboratory, McLean Hospital, Belmont Massachusetts 

4.     Elizabeth Loftus, PhD, Distinguished Professor, University of California-Irvine.

5.     Richard J. McNally, Ph.D., Professor and Director of Clinical Training, Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

6.     Harold Merskey, DM, FRCP, FRCPC, FRCPsych., Professor Emeritus of Psychiatry.

7.     Joel Paris, M.D. (M.B., B.Ch.)

8.     August Piper, M.D., independent practice of psychiatry, Seattle, WA.

9.     Numan Gharaibeh, MD (MB, BCh), Principal Psychiatrist, Western Connecticut Mental Health Network, Danbury, CT.

10. Pamela Freyd, Ph.D.

11. Brian Boffi, MD, Principal Psychiatrist, Western Connecticut Mental Health Network, Torrington, Torrington, CT.

12. Alexander Miano, M.D.

13. Joanne Iurato, PhD, Clinical Director, Western Connecticut Mental Health Network, Danbury, CT.

14. Donna Pellerin, M.D., Medical Director of Inpatient Services, Danbury Hospital, Danbury, CT.

15.  Jennifer Ballew, DO, Principal Psychiatrist, Western Connecticut Mental Health Network, Waterbury, CT

The letter includes references to papers written by themselves which are mere opinion pieces, with no reference to actual research studies, such as our paper showing smaller amygdala volume and hippocampal volume on MRI in women with childhood sexual abuse and the diagnosis of DID. They make silly references to popular movies about DID and claim that embarrassment about over dramatization of the disorder should be the basis for changing psychiatric nosology.

The leader of their merry band is Paul McHugh, MD, former Chair of Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins Medical School, who got the job because they hate all things behavioral there, and would hire only someone who would trash his own, and who was once described as an “evil leprechaun”.

Dr Paul McHugh debates lolcat.

Dr Paul McHugh debates lolcat.

The letter is a shoddy piece that says “we think this is so, therefore make these changes,” exactly the kind of thing that irks me about the whole DSM process, and led us to form the Shadow Team and to square off against the authors of a special issue of Journal of Anxiety questioning the validity of the PTSD diagnosis.

We’re not gonna take it.

The group that wrote the letter includes people who have profited by working as expert witnesses on behalf of parents accused in courts of childhood abuse, but make no disclosure of that fact. I am not sure who they think they are protecting, but I surely wouldn’t want to have one of them as my psychiatrist or psychologist. This anti-trauma bias of the DSM is why we formed the DSM Shadow Team in the first place. Head of the DSM committee, David Kupfer MD, has said that he wants to cut down on the number of psychiatric diagnoses in DSM V. He also simply skipped forming a committee to review the Dissociative Disorders. So which of the diagnoses is he going to drop? It certainly isn’t going to be any of the one generating billions of dollars for the pharmaceutical industry, like major depression.

Since they don’t seem to have anything better to do, and it is a spring day, I thought I would let them dance around the Maypole together for a while.

From L to R: Numan Gharaibeh MD, August Piper MD, Pamela Freyd PhD, Joel Paris MD, Joanne Iurato PhD, Elizabeth Loftus PhD, Donna Pellerin MD (in front), Harold Merskey MD, Richard McNally PhD, James Hudson MD, Harrison Pope MD (in front), Paul McHugh MD (green hat) (not included in picture) Brian Boffi MD, Alexander Miano MD, Jennifer Ballew DO

From L to R: Numan Gharaibeh MD, August Piper MD, Pamela Freyd PhD, Joel Paris MD, Joanne Iurato PhD, Elizabeth Loftus PhD, Donna Pellerin MD (in front), Harold Merskey MD, Richard McNally PhD, James Hudson MD, Harrison Pope MD (in front), Paul McHugh MD (green hat) (not included in picture) Brian Boffi MD, Alexander Miano MD, Jennifer Ballew DO

9 Responses to Authors of Bogus Letter Asking for Removal of Dissociative Disorders from DSM Dance Together Around a Maypole

  1. Gianna says:

    I know people with DID this is an atrocity and a spit in all these traumatized people’s faces.

    (as is the stupid offensive show the United States of Tara)

  2. Marian says:

    Makes me think of Wilhelm Fliess. Just like your previous post. Can’t help it.

  3. The sad thing (and the worrisome thing) is that this ‘expert group’ seems to believe what they say. It’s my guess that with all this lobbying, writing, and giving talks against sexual abuse, ptsd, and did they don’t have a lot of time to see real clients/patients. Otherwise they would not be able to keep up this stance.

  4. Doug Bremner says:

    They are either academic psychologists who don’t see patients and have invented their own fantasy world in this area, or psychiatrists who don’t have any particular credentials in this area and who probably are drug treatment focused.

  5. Therapy Patient says:

    It seems logical that since psychiatry is moving in the direction away from psychotherapy and towards drug-prescriptions-only it would be logical to deny the tie between childhood abuse and difficulty in adulthood. Instead, why not slap on a diagnosis that has a drug attached to it and hand out a prescription. I thank God for my traditional psychotherapist still practicing past age 65.

  6. Lynn Shepler MD JD says:

    Sad to hear this news. So much real scientific work went into establishing this diagnosis in the DSM. Perhaps these individuals who sent the letter have never been properly trained to pick up this diagnosis. I spent years working in prisons and jails as a forensic psychiatrist and saw many males with dissociative disorders, and they also reported the histories of physical, sexual and emotional abuse that one would expect as the bases for a dissociative disorder. In general, it seems that the entire field of medicine is out of tune. People with conflicts of interest who don’t report them trying to influence the field in illegitimate ways. There needs to be much more of a focus on ethics in medical school and in CME training, imo.

    I think members of my family were disappointed when I left to practice law, but I remember at the time I felt that medicine had sunk to such a point that I had no qualms. The only unfortunate thing is that it seems the general public does not yet “get it,” and demand more regulation and oversight.

    Lynn Shepler MD JD

  7. geewhiz says:

    I’ve found that the false memory and non believers in DID have a very high percentage of perpetrators in their ranks. Conflict of interest indeed.

  8. Amanda says:

    It’s sad to think so called professionals, could get it so wrong. Thank goodness for the likes of Gundren

  9. Doug says:

    You failed to post the full letter which actually details their arguments. Why is that? And the papers referenced are actual scientific papers with reasonable conclusions, unlike the amgdalar & hippocampal volumes paper which shows results expected of any subject with PTSD, establishing nothing in the way of evidence for distinct identities caused by trauma. “No reference to actual research studies”? Why don’t you print the full the letter? If you’re interested in an assessment of DID research, I suggest McNally’s ‘Remembering Trauma’.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>