- About
- Blogosphere Buzz
- Archived Posts 2007-2008
- Register for Email Alerts
- The Book: Before You Take That Pill: Why the Drug Industry May Be Bad For Your Health
- Follow me on twitter @dougbremner
- Subscribe to my podcasts
- Rave Reviews for “The Goose That Laid the Golden Egg: Accutane, the truth that had to be told”
- Follow me on goodreads
Letting the Horse Out of the Barn: Impending Disaster with New DSM-5 criteria.
I have written before about the DSM-5 process, including criticisms that the process is not transparent and that it is dominated by psychiatrists with histories of consulting to pharmaceutical companies, and that the process of revising DSM is driven by the royalties that the American Psychiatric Association depends on selling new copies to pay for its expenses.
Now the proposed criteria are out, but the link did not work for gender identity disorders or dissociative disorders, although this is the last day for comments. The PTSD criteria were present and I had the following critiques which I posted there.
There are no plans to do a field trial to compare prevalence of PTSD under the new criteria compared to DSM-IV-TR. We will unleash a diagnostic classification system with no idea about the impact it will make on diagnosis. This will increase overnight the number of people who meet criteria for the disorder, with the associated stigma and risk of adverse effects of treatment. The new “Criteria A” expands the number exposed from half the population to probably all of the population (although we don’t know for sure, as there are no studies). Anyone who has witnessed death or threatened death, or threatened sexual violation, or heard about it from a close friend or relative, or heard about aversive details. It doesn’t matter how they reacted, as the stipulation “associated with intense fear, horror or helplessness” has been removed. Some symptoms like “I’ve lost my soul forever” are grounded in JudeoChristian beliefs (this last one makes me wonder if the lights are on in there).
Did you know that you don’t have to use the DSM or buy it? Yep. All you need is the ICD-9 codes for insurance or billing purposes.That’s the APA’s dirty little secret.
Here are the proposed criteria for PTSD
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder*
A. The person was exposed to the following event(s): death or threatened death, actual or threatened serious injury, or actual or threatened sexual violation, in one or more of the following ways:**
1.Experiencing the event(s) him/herself2.Witnessing the event(s) as they occurred to others
3.Learning that the event(s) occurred to a close relative or close friend
4.Experiencing repeated or extreme exposure to aversive details of the event(s) (e.g., first responders collecting body parts; police officers repeatedly exposed to details of child abuse)NOTE: Witnessing or exposure to aversive details does not include events that are witnessed only in electronic media, television, movies or pictures, unless this is part of a person’s vocational role. Exposure to aversive details of death applies only to unnatural death.
B. Intrusion symptoms that are associated with the traumatic event(s) (that began after the traumatic event(s)), as evidenced by 1 or more of the following:
1.Spontaneous or cued recurrent, involuntary, and intrusive distressing memories of the traumatic event(s). Note: In children, repetitive play may occur in which themes or aspects of the traumatic event(s) are expressed.
2.Recurrent distressing dreams in which the content and/or affect of the dream is related to the event(s). Note: In children, there may be frightening dreams without recognizable content. ***
3.Dissociative reactions (e.g., flashbacks) in which the individual feels or acts as if the traumatic event(s) were recurring (Such reactions may occur on a continuum, with the most extreme expression being a complete loss of awareness of present surroundings.) Note: In children, trauma-specific reenactment may occur in play.
4.Intense or prolonged psychological distress at exposure to internal or external cues that symbolize or resemble an aspect of the traumatic event(s)
5.Marked physiological reactions to reminders of the traumatic event(s)
C. Persistent avoidance of stimuli associated with the traumatic event(s) (that began after the traumatic event(s)), as evidenced by efforts to avoid 1 or more of the following:
1.Thoughts, feelings, or physical sensations that arouse recollections of the traumatic event(s)
2.Activities, places, physical reminders, or times (e.g., anniversary reactions) that arouse recollections of the traumatic event(s)
3.People, conversations, or interpersonal situations that arouse recollections of the traumatic event(s)
D. Negative alterations in cognitions and mood that are associated with the traumatic event(s) (that began or worsened after the traumatic event(s)), as evidenced by 3 or more of the following: Note: In children, as evidenced by 2 or more of the following:****
1.Inability to remember an important aspect of the traumatic event(s) (typically dissociative amnesia; not due to head injury, alcohol, or drugs).
2.Persistent and exaggerated negative expectations about one’s self, others, or the world (e.g., “I am bad,” “no one can be trusted,” “I’ve lost my soul forever,” “my whole nervous system is permanently ruined,” “the world is completely dangerous”).
3.Persistent distorted blame of self or others about the cause or consequences of the traumatic event(s)
4.Pervasive negative emotional state — for example: fear, horror, anger, guilt, or shame
5.Markedly diminished interest or participation in significant activities.
6.Feeling of detachment or estrangement from others.
7.Persistent inability to experience positive emotions (e.g., unable to have loving feelings, psychic numbing)
E. Alterations in arousal and reactivity that are associated with the traumatic event(s) (that began or worsened after the traumatic event(s)), as evidenced by 3 or more of the following: Note: In children, as evidenced by 2 or more of the following:****
1.Irritable, angry, or aggressive behavior2.Reckless or self-destructive behavior
3.Hypervigilance
4.Exaggerated startle response
5.Problems with concentration
6.Sleep disturbance — for example, difficulty falling or staying asleep, or restless sleep.
F. Duration of the disturbance (symptoms in Criteria B, C, D and E) is more than one month.
G. The disturbance causes clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.
Specify if:
With Delayed Onset: if diagnostic threshold is not exceeded until 6 months or more after the event(s) (although onset of some symptoms may occur sooner than this).
http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=165
5 Responses to Letting the Horse Out of the Barn: Impending Disaster with New DSM-5 criteria.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Recent Posts
- Bookvisions Blog, Review of Goose That Laid the Golden Review
- Follow the Conversation on What Doctors Don’t Tell You, on Jane Alexander Blog
- Husband of Missing Susan Cox Powell Blows Himself and His Kids Up
- Indie Author Tag Fest
- Dear Doctor, Cipro and Levaquin Might Make Your Tendons Snap Off
- Goose that Laid the Golden Egg Now Top Rated Health Book on Amazon
- Podcast: Don’t Take Away My Asperger’s Diagnosis
- Georgia Medical Schools Take Steps to Stop Flow of Pharmaceutical Money
- Join the Discussion on my Author Q&A Page on Goodreads
- Before You Take That Pill Top 10 Blog Posts for 2011
Recent Comments
- mahnazx5 on Angioplasty Found to be Useless Waste of Money
- David Medearis on Rebecca Zahau Ties Hands Behind Back, Leaps off Balcony, Hangs Self: Yeah, right.
- CIPRO IS POISON on Dear Doctor, Cipro and Levaquin Might Make Your Tendons Snap Off
- LW on Effects of Zoloft on Childhood Anxiety Incredible, Indeed
- Francine Howarth Author on Indie Author Tag Fest
Categories
- academic freedom
- Acne
- ADHD
- Alternative Medicine
- Antibiotics
- Antihypertensives
- Antipsychotics
- Anxiety
- Arthritis
- Bipolar Disorder
- Book Reviews
- BPH
- cancer
- Chamber of Horrors
- Childhood mental disorders
- Cholesterol
- CNN, TrueTV, & YouTube
- Continuing Medical Education
- Dementia
- Diabetes
- Diet Pills
- Doctors
- Drug & Alcohol Abuse
- DSM Shadow Team
- Healthcare Politics
- Heart Disease
- Hormone Replacement
- Medications in Children
- Osteoporosis
- pharmaceutical industry
- Podcasts by Doug Bremner MD
- Psychiatry
- PTSD
- Quackery
- Screening & Prevention
- Sexual Dysfunction
- Side Effects
- Social Networking
- Statins
- Substance Abuse
- Supplements
- True Crime
- Uncategorized
- Vaccines
- Video segments of Doug Bremner
- Vitamins
- Women's health
Media Blogs
Archives






Do criteria under “G” have to be met to apply the Dx under this scheme?
Most troubling as you point out, is the lack of studies behind this.
Dear Dr. Bremner:
Thank you for posting your comments and observations regarding the DSM-5 process. The DSM only deals with symptoms. How frustrating! You would think that the field of neuroscience didn’t exist. The psychiatric community won’t allow functional magnetic resonance imaging equipment to be used as a diagnostic tool.
Even though we now have the ability to regenerate the hippocampus using noninvasive means, the psychiatric community prescribes drug cocktails. So many people have died needlessly and the DSM committee goes on its merry way.
@ Steve.
Yes, Criterion G has to be met. All the “letter” criteria are required.
The DSM is as complicated as a scratch card lottery: Find at least [minimum number] of the criteria and you win the diagnosis.
In the above post you state that if we unleash the proposed DSM5 criteria: “This will increase overnight the number of people who meet criteria for the disorder, with the associated stigma and risk of adverse effects of treatment.” I do not agree with you on this point. Although the new A criterion will certainly increase the number of exposed people, it will not necessarily increase the number of people who meet the PTSD criteria.
) and colleague’s make a good case for dropping the whole A criterion in their JTS paper(doi:10.1002).
I don’t think that a more liberal A criterion will lead to substantially more PTSD diagnosis. In a recent paper by Karam, Kessler and colleagues in Biological Psychiatry (doi:10.1016)this is confirmed. In their huge international study the authors found that: “.. the sample-specific prevalence of PTSD increased only very slightly [3.64% to 3.69%] when A2 was not required for diagnosis.” They conclude that “Removal of A2 from the DSM4 criterion set would reduce the complexity of diagnosing PTSD, while not substantially increase the number of people who qualify for diagnosis. Criterion A2 should consequently be reconceptualized as a risk factor for PTSD rather than as a diagnostic requirement”. I would like to take their recommendations one (radical) step further and not only drop criterion A2 but also drop the A1 criterion. Brewin, Lanius (fellow shadow team member
[...] A new PTSD criterian A that by removing the reaction to the event (e.g. “intense fear horror or helplessness” required for the current diagnosis) and generalizing to include threatening events to anyone you have ever known or talked to effectively makes the entire US population eligible to be diagnosed with PTSD. Oh, um, except for atheists, since they probably won’t get the symptom “I lost my soul forever” which is part of the proposed new criteria. [...]