- About
- Blogosphere Buzz
- Archived Posts 2007-2008
- Register for Email Alerts
- The Book: Before You Take That Pill: Why the Drug Industry May Be Bad For Your Health
- Follow me on twitter @dougbremner
- Subscribe to my podcasts
- Rave Reviews for “The Goose That Laid the Golden Egg: Accutane, the truth that had to be told”
- Follow me on goodreads
- Catania! The movie
Amanda Knox and the Coercive Interrogation Tactics of the Polizia di Stato in Perugia
At this point in the Amanda Knox trial there is no physical evidence to uphold the conviction of murder of her flat mate Meredith Kercher. The only thing people can point to is that she “confessed” and “placed herself at the scene”. This, however, can be explained by the illegal techniques used by the Polizia di Stato in Perugia in her interrogation and a knowledge of the science of memory and the psychology of coercion.
There is a large scientific literature showing that you can create memories through repeated and coercive questioning. An example is the classic study of Hymand and Billings in the field of psychology where people are interviewed over and over about an event that happened when they were young and spilled a punch bowl at a party. After repeated questioning they forget where they heard about the punch bowl and attribute it to themselves. It is called source amnesia. Amanda’s vague description of the memory, and then the realization once she had some distance from the cops that “her” memory was more real than “theirs” followed by a retraction is consistent with this. Here is the abstract of the original study.
We conducted two experiments to investigate if college students would create false memories of childhood experiences in response to misleading information and repeated interviews. In both experiments we contacted parents to obtain information about events that happened to the students during childhood. In a series of interviews we asked the students to recall the parent-reported events and one experimenter-created false event. In the second experiment we varied the age at which we claimed the false event occurred. In both experiments we found that some individuals created false memories in these circumstances and in the second experiment we found no effect of age of attempted incorporation. In the second experiment we also found that those who discussed related background knowledge during the early interviews were more likely to create a false recall. Generalizations to therapy contexts are discussed.
Hyman, I. E. Jr and Billings, F. J (1998). Individual differences and the creation of false childhood memories. Memory, 6, 1-20.
Here is the way the police would do it. They found a African hair at the murder scene in the hand of the victim Meredith Kercher, went through Amanda’s phone (remember Italian police think murderer most likely flat mate), got the ci vediamo/see you later text to Amanda’s employer Patrick Lumumba (who is African) which they interpret as an Italian speaker would that they made a date for later, got some confusing data from Patrick’s sim card that he might have been in the area (he wasn’t). They interview Amanda’s boyfriend Raffaele Sollecito and get him to concede that it was “possible” that Amanda sleep walked right on out of his apartment, then they told Amanda that Raffaele wasn’t providing an alibi and that they had proof she was at the scene at the time of the murder (another lie). They then said rack your brain and imagine a scene with Patrick at the scene of the crime and gave her some examples (12 cops, rotating, all night interrogation without a lawyer or indepedent interpreter, hit on head to help with “memory”). She is stressed, and they say tell us what we need and you can go home otherwise you will never see your family again. She is naive and thinks cops are the good guys cuz she watched too much TV. She wants to cooperate (remember the Italians knowing better lawyered up but she didnt) and finally goes as far as they want, maybe remembering something they suggested as part of her “vision”. They get her to sign and she goes home. Inadmissible in court. Next day she retracts. This coerced “confession” is ruled inadmissible in court by the superior court but in a loophole they read it during the trial anyway.
Shazam!
Related Posts:
Amanda Knox Convicted on the Basis of Cartwheels and Kisses
My Thoughts on the Amanda Knox Case
More Tabloid Trash Coming Out of the UK on the Amanda Knox Case
My Rebuttal to “Angel Face” the Book about Amanda Knox
Forget Everything You Ever Knew About the Amanda Knox Case
Does Italy Have Freedom of Speech? Perugia Blocks Blogger Critical of Amanda Knox Prosecutor Mignini
Murder Abroad: Drew Griffin Reports on the Amanda Knox Case in CNN Video
Not Enough DNA and Key Witness Changes His Testimony in Amanda Knox Case
Tagged with: Amanda Knox • Coerced confessions • false memory • Giuliano Mignini • Patricia Stefanoni • Perugia • Perugia police • Polizia di Stato Perugia
8 Responses to Amanda Knox and the Coercive Interrogation Tactics of the Polizia di Stato in Perugia
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Recent Posts
- Only 7 days to go on Kickstarter! campaign for our film Catania! Please help!
- Soldiers, Families, take part in Callaway Homecoming Initiative
- Think Talk Radio: Interview
- Video: Women, Stress & Health Conference at Karolinska Inst.- Heart Disease in Women
- Book Review: Under the House
- Book Review: Falling Women, and Other Stories
- Please Help Our Kickstarter Campaign to Make Our Independent Film Catania!
- Catania! Launches!
- Video: Pilot Program to Help Returning War Veterans Launches at Callaway Gardens
- Callaway Homecoming Initiative (CHI) Launch!
Recent Comments
- Steven Alper on Callaway Homecoming Initiative (CHI) Launch!
- Video: Women, Stress & Health Conference at Karolinska Inst.- Heart - Coronary Heart Disease on Video: Women, Stress & Health Conference at Karolinska Inst.- Heart Disease in Women
- cristeen on More Bullshit Research About a Pill That Will Erase Bad Memories
- Nancy on Accutane and Depression: A Depressing Tale
- lee phillips on Please Help Our Kickstarter Campaign to Make Our Independent Film Catania!
Categories
- academic freedom
- Acne
- ADHD
- Alternative Medicine
- Antibiotics
- Antidepressants
- Antihypertensives
- Antipsychotics
- Anxiety
- Arthritis
- Bipolar Disorder
- Book Reviews
- BPH
- cancer
- Chamber of Horrors
- Childhood mental disorders
- Cholesterol
- CNN, TrueTV, & YouTube
- Continuing Medical Education
- Dementia
- Diabetes
- Diet Pills
- Doctors
- Drug & Alcohol Abuse
- DSM Shadow Team
- Healthcare Politics
- Heart Disease
- Hormone Replacement
- Medications in Children
- Osteoporosis
- pharmaceutical industry
- Podcasts by Doug Bremner MD
- Psychiatry
- PTSD
- Quackery
- Screening & Prevention
- Sexual Dysfunction
- Side Effects
- Social Networking
- Statins
- Substance Abuse
- Supplements
- True Crime
- Uncategorized
- Vaccines
- Video segments of Doug Bremner
- Vitamins
- Women's health
Media Blogs
Archives






[...] found all over the room and his DNA inside the body of the victim. Open and shut case. You can read here about what happened during the interrogation process that lead the police to arrest Patrick [...]
[...] (you can read more background here and here and read about the fake “confession” here). Blogger Frank [...]
[...] Read this in English here. [...]
Love your posts. You are telling the parts of the truth that I WISH would make it into mainstream media. Now that the DNA evidence refutes the prosecution, wonder what they will be up to next!
Thank you very much!
[...] and researched the topics of behavior, memory, and stress, I would suggest that she look at my post on the coercive interrogation tactics and false confessions in the [...]
This case has recently caught my attention. I initially was inclined to believe their guilt. I visited TMJK and was almost sure I was convinced. But there were two glaring facts which bothered me.
1. if the police were well intentioned and competent they’d surely not resort to illegal interrogation techniques
2. the absence of physical evidence against Amanda inside Meredith’s room where a voilent crime happened. I knew by then Rafaelle’s DNA on the bra clasp was being contested. Besides, to find a small amount of DNA which could not be tested again was actually a red flag for me. The absence of abundance is a red flag.
Then I found the website http://www.injusticeinperugia.com. Steve Moore articulated the reservations I had and even more.
As a nephew of someone who was wrongly convicted I know how easily cops could take away our liberties which is a shame because they’re suppose to be our protectors. What is very surprising for me though is how stupid people could be. Surely the provisions in the law against illegal interrogation techniques have it’s reasons. I thought this was already common sense. Yet, a lot of people bought the coerced confession as a sign of guilt? It should’ve been a red flag that the cops were good for nothing! It doesn’t take a lot of clicks in the internet to understand about illegal interrogation techniques for someone who is not well read and couldn’t use simple logic.
One last thing if someone can clarify this. One of the arguments against Amanda that I found no rebuttal yet is about the shoe prints proving Rudy was running away from Meredith’s room to leave the house. Yet Meredith’s blood was found in the bathroom? So the prosecutors positted that there was someone else involved who decided to clean up in the bathroom.
Can anyone care to explain?
Rudy himself said he went to the bathroom to clean up then returned to the room of the victim with a towel to try and staunch the bleeding – then fled by the front door. This would explain the pattern of footsterps. There is no need to invoke additional persons. And the prosecutions conjecture of multiple attackers is nothing more than that – pure conjecture.
thanks